<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bricks and mortar issue: further moves from eBay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.consumerchoice.eu/uk/2010/02/24/bricks-and-mortar-issue-further-moves-from-ebay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.consumerchoice.eu/uk/2010/02/24/bricks-and-mortar-issue-further-moves-from-ebay/</link>
	<description>Just another Campaign for Consumer Choice weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:10:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: guy clapperton</title>
		<link>http://blog.consumerchoice.eu/uk/2010/02/24/bricks-and-mortar-issue-further-moves-from-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>guy clapperton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.consumerchoice.eu/uk/?p=288#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Phil. But are you saying that a law that could undermine a business as substantial as, say, eBay (the owner of this blog) or Amazon is well formulated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Phil. But are you saying that a law that could undermine a business as substantial as, say, eBay (the owner of this blog) or Amazon is well formulated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://blog.consumerchoice.eu/uk/2010/02/24/bricks-and-mortar-issue-further-moves-from-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.consumerchoice.eu/uk/?p=288#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Its about time that etailers took the responsability for their Pimping of bricks and mortar retailers and the addition of this clause may being a reality check to this arrogant sector who think they are the new gods of retail without accountabilty to the countries they trade in and from</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its about time that etailers took the responsability for their Pimping of bricks and mortar retailers and the addition of this clause may being a reality check to this arrogant sector who think they are the new gods of retail without accountabilty to the countries they trade in and from</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://blog.consumerchoice.eu/uk/2010/02/24/bricks-and-mortar-issue-further-moves-from-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.consumerchoice.eu/uk/?p=288#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Its about time that etailers took the responsability for their Pimping of bricks and mortar retailers and the addition of this clause may being a reality check to this arrogant sector who think they are the new gods of retail without accountabilty to the counties they trade in and from</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its about time that etailers took the responsability for their Pimping of bricks and mortar retailers and the addition of this clause may being a reality check to this arrogant sector who think they are the new gods of retail without accountabilty to the counties they trade in and from</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

